Kill Shot

“Gender is used to describe the characteristics of women and men that are socially constructed, while sex refers to those that are biologically determined. People are born female or male, but learn to be girls and boys who grow into women and men. This learned behavior makes up gender identity and determines gender roles” WHO.

“There are no differences between men and women, they are the same, therefore we can choose to identify however we want, because the two are interchangeable”

To contextualize what this post is about kindly check out this five minute video

Gender vs Sex

Gender is a social construct that is determined by what society sees fit, what this means, in theory, is that, the facts that determine gender depend on the shared ways of thinking of society rather than on physical reality. This definition of Gender implies that the views of people in society construct a concept that has no way of objectively quantifying it, and it is this loophole where the definition of gender is fundamentally flawed. This definition undermines the foundation of science as the pursuit of objectivity and defies any attempt at falsifying it.

Firstly, it is not possible to completely discard science as a determining factor of gender, it should be the primary and fundamental principle upon which gender should be defined. It is biology that determines physical ability and to a certain extent behavior. It is no fallacy that roles and behavior are influenced by the obvious biological and psychological differences that exist between males and females. And if scientific facts determine our physical abilities and behavior, then scientific facts above all should play a role in the definition of gender.

Secondly, gender being a social construct makes it hard to falsify or clearly define, because gender is whatever people come up with. There are currently about 72 to 100 ways of identifying gender which makes the point I am trying to put across, there is no objective way of determining gender therefore, gender can be anything. that is why you have people identifying as "nonbinary" these are individuals whose gender changes based on how they feel,

Why does it matter?

The problem that has arisen with all movements that argue that gender is not defined by science/biology is that they try to tie in and deny the existence of the biological differences that determine the two groups of people (male and female). Biological and psychological differences do exist and have a part to play in whatever role an individual chooses to play.

Radical feminist

Men and Women are more alike or the same in personality than they are different by a substantial margin. There is more similarity than difference, but that doesn’t mean that the difference is insignificant. if you pick two people from the population and guess who is the more aggressive, you’d be right 60% of the time if you say the male is more aggressive. So, in theory ,the difference in aggression between males and females is about 3:2 which isn’t a big difference to be fair but the statistics go haywire when you consider the extremes. If you had to pick the most aggressive individual out of a 100, you’d discover that it would be a male almost all the time, that is why you have more males in prisons than females. This is important because even though at the midpoint the differences are minimal but at the extremes the differences are enormous. And most of the activities that determine the roles played by males and females occur at the extremes, what I mean by this is that while the differences in aggression might be minimal at the midpoint “provocation” or the extremes of life situations enlarges the gap. Psychologically males are more aggressive than females, i.e. aggression is defined as “behavior intended to cause harm to someone who is motivated to avoid that harm”.

Are Men and Women equal?

A straight answer cannot be given to the question because it requires an understanding of what is meant by being equal. Should men and women have the same rights, yes most definitely, should men and women have the same opportunity for jobs, carrier choices etc., yes. should there be equality of outcome to the opportunities …..well it is illogical to assume that just because the opportunities have been provided you will get equality of outcome because there are differences between male and female.

In general, men are physically built bigger and stronger than women, its not a conspiracy against women it’s a fact that is consistent beyond reasonable doubt, a study was done in which on recruitment into a certain army the average male was able to do a certain number of pull-ups while the average female couldn't keep up with the bare minimum for males, that is why the physical standard for women to get in the military had to be lowered because physically women cannot perform at the same rate as males, its illogical to think women are physically at par to males, while exceptions to the rule exist, the rule still stands. Put the best female boxer with the best male in the same ring, or the best female soccer team, best female runner…they will always be slaughtered by the males. Look at the unfairness in women's sports where the female transgenders are now getting all the trophies because these are men choosing to identify as women.

And it is therefore no fallacy to assume that generally speaking roles and jobs that require more of physical ability than anything else will be dominated by the male gender due to obvious physical advantage. And so equality of opportunity is giving males and females the same opportunity to apply for plumbing or going into the army, but it is illogical to assume that the outcome which is the number of hired or recruited individuals will be 50:50 because of the obvious physical advantage that males have. The only way you would get a 50:50 is if you lower the standard on one side which defeats the whole “male and females are equal argument”

Psychological studies have shown that females are more interested in people while males are more interested in things, it’s a gross simplification of the differences in interests that exist between males and females but the differences are obvious to the non radical mind.

The differences obviously exist, and to deny their existence and their impact on the roles and determination of gender is by definition delusion. Don’t get me wrong, sexism exists the same way that racism still exist, but the problem arises when while fighting against sexism some try to completely obliterate the obvious differences that exist between male and female in their attempt to equalize opportunity they try to link in equality of outcome as well.

It may seem as if i have gone from the transgenders to the radical feminists but if you really think about it, they have one goal in mind, in fact, that is the Goal of the entire LGBTQI (and you can throw in the radical feminist in there) …, the extreme goal is simple “complete obliteration of the sex differences”. The ultimate goal is to live in a world where there is no male or female just people. Forgetting that the two (male and female) are not interchangeable. All utter nonsense, I believe there are three types of people who push the LGBTQi… doctrine

1. People who genuinely have a mental disorder or are confused and need help (See Frankenstein’s Monster)

2. People who push the doctrine because of malicious & sinister intent

3. People who are bullied by the LGBTqi + Radical Feminist movements

LGBTQI terrorist are busy BULLYING individuals, companies, and even governments. It is now a hate crime to misgender an individual. And we will never solve this nonsense until we go back to the root cause, how it all started, it all started with the homos,

Do not force society to indulge in your delusion.

Men and women are not interchangeable

Simple analogy

Imagine two cups, one filled with salt and the other filled with sugar, the two contents of the cups are equal in quantity but they serve different roles....you can use sugar in tea, but you can't interchange with salt, that doesn't mean salt is of less value it simply means that it's not suited for that purpose, you can use salt in relish. Now a confused individual might say that he chooses to identify salt as sugar and use salt in sugar. That doesn't automatically turn salt to sugar.

We live in a confused world imagine how society will be 100 years from now if this nonsense continues...we are now being forced to use gender neutral terms, even in churches for crying out loud. What nonsense and the radical feminist who are easily offended are no exception. Because it seems the ultimate goal is the same regardless of how genuine and noble the founding feminist arguments were but now as it is currently defined.. it's Confusion.

references

Anderson, C. A., and Bushman, B. J. (1997). External validity of ‘‘trivial’’ experiments: the case of laboratory aggression. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1, 19–41. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.1.1.19 Anderson, C. A., and Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 27–51. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231 Angus, D. J., Schutter, D. J. L. G., Terburg, D., van Honk, J., and HarmonJones, E. (2016). ‘‘A review of social neuroscience research on anger and aggression,’’ in Social Neuroscience: Biological Approaches to Social Psychology, eds E. Harmon-Jones and M. Inzlicht (New York, NY: Psychology Press), 223–246